Muhali, Muhali and Yuanita, Leny and Ibrahim, Muslimin (2019) Similarity Check: "The Validity and Effectiveness of The Reflective-Metacognitive Learning Model in Improving Students’ Metacognitive Ability in Indonesia". [Artefact]
![[img]](https://repository.undikma.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
3. Artikel pada MJLI.pdf Download (7MB) |
Abstract
Purpose: Reflective-Metacognitive Learning (RML) Model is a learning model with reflective attributions in every learning phases to enable conscious thinking process to increase students' metacognition ability through four phases: 1) orientation reflection; 2) organizational reflection; 3) execution reflection; and 4) verification reflection. This study aims to analyze the validity and effectiveness of RML Model along with its’ support devices. Methodology: This research is an experimental research that began with development of RML Model adapting Borg and Gall development design consist of: 1) planning, 2) development, and 3) evaluation. Focus Group Discussion (FGD) from four science education experts was conducted to determine the validity of RML Model and its supporting devices in terms of content validity and construct validity. The randomized pretest posttest control group design was used to evaluate the effectiveness of RML Model and Cognitive-Metacognitive Learning (CML) Model which implemented in 40 students of senior high school which analyzed descriptively and inferential statistics by independent sample t-test and paired t-test. Findings: The results were obtained: RML Model was stated very valid both in content (3.89) and construct (3.84), metacognition knowledge increased with high category (mean of n-gain: 0.76), skill, and metacognition awareness increased in medium category (mean of n-gain: 0.66; and 0.4) for experimental group, while for control group, metacognition knowledge, skills, and awareness increased with medium category (mean of n-gain: 0.6; 0.475; 0.3125) and statistical analysis showed that there was improvement in students' metacognition ability in both groups (p <0.05), and can be concluded that RML model is valid and more effective than CML Model to increase student’s metacognition ability. Significance: RML Models are expected to contribute to improving students' metacognition skills, characterized by reflection of thought processes that are at the core of metacognition ability.
| Item Type: | Artefact |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Learning model, RML model, validity of RML model, metacognitive ability, effectiveness of RML model and CML model. |
| Subjects: | L Education > L Education (General) |
| Divisions: | Biro > Biro Administrasi Umum |
| Depositing User: | Admin Jafung UNDIKMA |
| Date Deposited: | 04 Jun 2023 12:57 |
| Last Modified: | 04 Jun 2023 12:57 |
| URI: | http://repository.undikma.ac.id/id/eprint/1010 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |